Two AI assistants each: Meta for life, Microsoft for work

Result

If held over the last 3 months (Jul 30, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026): +18.9%. Over the same days: S&P 500 +5.3%.

What it holds

• Personal assistant, 50% of the money, +14.6% over 3 months: META (Meta). The personal agent goes to whoever knows your preferences.
• Work assistant, 50% of the money, +24.9% over 3 months: MSFT (Microsoft). The work agent goes to whoever holds the company’s tools and trust.

The plan behind it

Rihard Jarc wrote on 28 Sep that people will want two AI assistants, one personal and one for work. Meta is well placed for the personal one because it already knows your preferences. Microsoft is well placed for the work one as the router and keeper of company data. This holds Meta and Microsoft in equal parts.

The AI agent market is not zero sum market. I believe each of us will want at least two seperate AI assistants in their life. One being a personal one covering their personal life and the other being work related. $META and $MSFT are well positioned and made the first moves. The reason why we will want to seperate those two roles is because each agent must prioritize different goals and objectives: 1. A personal assistant is meant to optimize and take in account your life goals and preferences. It should also be high in privacy and not meant to be observed, audited or transfered. 2. A work agent will probably be a owned and shared with your employer. Once you leave a company or change jobs the agent will get deprovisioned and the memory will stay with the employer (that is why you don't want any of your personal stuff in there). The employer wants the agent to be observed, audited all the time. Because of privacy and safety your employeer will also not approve of all the integrations and connectors that your personal agent would want because it poses a risk to company data and cyber risk. The way I believe we will have these agents is that the personal and the work agent will communicate on matters that they need to like calendar scheduling or other tasks, but each keep their own data seperate and siloted from each other. I made an image of an example I made for $META's Muse potentially communicating with $MSFT Autopilot. For the personal assistant having the best IQ model doesn't matter its more a skillset similar to human assistants: knowing the boss's preferences, holding the keys to the calendar and inbox, knowing when to interrupt and when not to, being fast, being discreet, and being reliably available. $META is in my view positioned great for this as it is the closest to the current system of "knowing your preferences" from the social algo that they have on us. For the work agent it does seem like companies will want to be independent and not reliable on only one model vendor so an orchestration layer (between models & model companies) is almost needed here, especially as the workers tasks can change over time and different models are good at different things.. Here the companies that are very well positioned are the hyperscalers and especially $MSFT because they have many of the integrations that the assistants needs (human tools) + they have already established relationships and trust from companies. $MSFT again doesn't need to own their own frontier model they just need to be the best router and keeper of context and data (harness). The point I wanted to get across is that the AI assistant market is not there is only going to be one AI assistant that wins, as we will soon get a flurry of different AI assistants.

Picked by fxyz from @RihardJarc’s post.

What would prove it wrong: Companies and people pick other assistants over Meta’s and Microsoft’s.

FAQ

Can I make one from my own idea?

Yes. Write what you believe in plain words at https://f.xyz/create. fxyz asks a couple of questions, builds the portfolio and shows how it would have done over the last 3 months.

Can I turn a post on X into a theory?

Yes. Reply to the post and tag @fxyzai. It tests the view in the post and replies with the 3-month result and a link.

What can it trade?

Stocks (Tesla, Apple, Nvidia), crypto (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana), pre-IPO companies (OpenAI, Anthropic), indices (Nasdaq 100, S&P 500), commodities (gold, silver, oil, copper) and currencies (EUR/USD, USD/JPY). One theory can mix them, and bet for or against any of them.

How does it react to news?

On each check it reads the last two days of news on its biggest holdings and says whether the idea still holds. It can make one small change at a time: trim or drop one holding by up to 5 points. On autopilot the change waits 10 minutes so the owner can skip it; otherwise it asks first.

How do I run it with real money?

For real money, tap Make it mine, open your copy and choose Use real money, with an exchange connected: Hyperliquid, Lighter, Lighter (Robinhood), Backpack, Pacifica or Binance. The money stays in your own account there. fxyz can place trades, but it can never withdraw.

Can the AI get it wrong?

Yes. fxyz's AI turns the idea into holdings, and it can get that wrong: add a coin or stock that doesn't fit, or miss one that does. Check the holdings before you put money in. In your own copy, ask its chat to add or drop any of them.

What do the 3-month numbers mean?

What $100 would have done holding this mix over the last 3 months, at real prices. It is a what-if, not a record: past or simulated results are no promise of future ones, and nothing here is investment advice.